Summary
- The Popular Party proposes an amendment to a new plenary regulation.
- Controversial points include debate restrictions and intervention durations.
- This regulation aims to clarify the procedure for formal sessions.
- The anticipated vote on the initial amendment is set for Monday.
- Opposition parties express concerns over lack of proposals and negotiations.
Controversy Surrounds Amendment to Popular Party’s New Plenary Regulation
The Local Government team of the Popular Party (PP) is set to clarify its new plenary regulation with an amendment to the text that was approved in committee this week. This regulation is intended to govern the procedures of plenary sessions but has sparked debate over its limitations on discussions and the duration of interventions. The initial amendment will be reviewed during the ordinary session scheduled for Monday.
Details of the Proposed Amendment
Signed by Deputy Mayor Rosario Martínez Chazarra, the amendment aims to eliminate any ambiguity in the current draft. It confirms that, during formal sessions where government agreements and decrees are presented, opposition groups will still have the right to make brief interventions. This clarification is necessary, as the current wording generically states that there “will be no debate.”
Under the new amendment, opposition groups will be allowed five minutes for these succinct interventions, ensuring they have a voice during the sessions.
Mayor’s Position
Mayor Eduardo Dolón emphasized that, even currently, there is limited debate during such discussions. Interventions are primarily summaries provided by government members, especially by Councilman Federico Alarcón and the Deputy Mayor. He stated, “But we will clarify it.” The amendment reflects that the formal presentation of decrees, resolutions, or reports will be accompanied by a succinct intervention from each municipal group, although these interventions will not lead to further debate.
Modification of Discussion Times
The amendment also addresses another controversial point: the duration of interventions. The initial regulation proposed limiting speaking times to three minutes for presentations and two for responses. However, the amendment expands these times to five minutes for presentations and three for replies, with the Mayor having the authority to extend these durations during significant debates, such as budget discussions.
Notably, the amendment maintains the limit on the number of questions (capped at three) and requests (set at two per session and municipal group), a structure established in the draft of the new regulation.
Opposition Response
The opposition parties have expressed dissatisfaction regarding the lack of meaningful proposals on these procedural changes. Sueña Torrevieja focused their discussions with the PP on contesting the section that restricts interventions during the presentation of decrees and government meetings, while the PSOE lamented that no representatives from the government have approached them to negotiate the text. The socialists have requested a report from the General Secretary of the plenary, Virgilio Estremera, seeking clarification on various elements of the new regulations.
Implications for Local Governance
The PP insists that this new regulation aligns perfectly with the practices of other municipalities governed under the Large Population regime. They highlight reforms intended to update and streamline functionality in plenary and collective bodies, last revised deeply in 1986. Key aspects of the reform include better organization for the Spokespersons’ Committee, which previously had minimal activity, and the inclusion of non-affiliated council members in the regulatory framework.
The amendment enhances the role of Informational Committees, allowing them to study, consult, prepare, and render opinions on the matters that will be debated during plenary sessions. Enhanced telematic participation for council members unable to attend in person is also a welcome update, promoting transparency and efficient access to information which will now be retrievable within 15 days instead of the previous 30-day window.
Looking Ahead
Once the new regulation comes into effect, motions will be debated in plenary sessions instead of being referred to other collegiate bodies, marking a significant shift in how local governance operates.
For more detailed information on the upcoming debates and regulations, you can view the original source of this news article here.

